What Did The 2020 March GAMSAT Look Like?
The latest episode of The Pre-Admission Game podcast offers invaluable insights into the evolving nature of the GAMSAT examination. Featuring experienced GAMSAT candidate Lauren, who is starting medical school next year, and host Arshad, the discussion delves into recent trends across all three GAMSAT sections and provides thoughtful predictions for the March 2020 exam.
Section 1: Moving Beyond the Abstract
One of the most notable shifts in Section 1 has been the transition from highly abstract, jargon-heavy texts to more accessible but substantially longer passages. As Lauren points out, "We've been moving towards things that are more accessible but typically a lot longer." This shift appears aligned with ACER's stated goal of reducing disadvantages for English as a second language speakers.
While the language has become more straightforward, the increased length creates new challenges. Passages that once occupied three-quarters of a page with 4-5 questions now stretch to one and a half pages with only 3 questions. This dramatic change in the "payoff" ratio has made time management increasingly crucial. Arshad also notes a growing emphasis on emotional reasoning rather than pure logic. Questions increasingly ask candidates to empathise with perspectives presented in texts, requiring them to "put themselves in the shoes" of different viewpoints rather than simply extracting information.
Section 2: From Abstract to Contextual
Perhaps the most significant transformation discussed is the shift in Section 2 from broad abstract concepts (e.g. love, courage, freedom) toward more specific, contextually grounded themes like family size and population control or taxation. This presents a fascinating challenge for candidates who must now navigate prompts with clearer boundaries while still demonstrating depth of thought. Despite this evolution, both Lauren and Arshad emphasise that an ideas-based approach to essay preparation remains highly effective. The key adjustment they recommend is expanding your repertoire of examples to ensure flexibility when tackling more specific themes.
Section 3: Blurring Disciplinary Lines
In Section 3, the traditional separation between disciplines is fading. Rather than discrete physics, chemistry or biology questions, ACER is increasingly presenting integrated scenarios that blur disciplinary boundaries. As Lauren explains, candidates might encounter "biophysics," "biochemistry," or completely unfamiliar contexts like veterinary biology instead of human physiology.
This approach deliberately challenges those who rely on memorised content rather than understanding fundamental principles. As Arshad colourfully illustrates, "They won't bring up a human heart. They'll bring up like some random toad," requiring candidates to apply conceptual understanding rather than recall specific anatomical details.
What’s Next?
What resonates most strongly throughout the podcast is the emphasis on underlying skills rather than specific content knowledge. Successful candidates aren't those who memorise facts but those who develop transferable analytical abilities. As Arshad reflects near the conclusion, the method of study is what is ultimately important. This wisdom applies across all sections - whether identifying themes, managing time pressure, or adapting to unfamiliar contexts.
Curious about how the GAMSAT keeps evolving? Tune into The Pre-Admission Game podcast to hear Lauren’s fresh, firsthand perspective - offering profound insights that are especially valuable for current candidates here:
Watch The Video Instead? 🤩
.png)
